22 January 2010

Was Pat Robertson Right?

It's only been in the last 200 years or so—and only in the Western world—that natural disasters have been entirely explained as the capricious whims of low pressure systems, the arbitrary shifting of tectonic plates or the random release of lava from volcanic pockets. The Enlightenment disabused the Western world of its archaic notions of divine judgment, along with the outdated mythology of angry river gods who flood villages and beneficent rain gods who water crops.

So, when an aging televangelist like Pat Robertson blames a devastating earthquake on a nation's apocryphal pact with the devil, both the Christian and secular world recoil in disgust and label him an insensitive and outdated buffoon. But is it possible that there is some proverbial meat left on the bones of Robertson's misled statement?

If we look at the biblical record, we will be hard pressed to find a natural disaster that does not have some spiritual dimension. Robertson's error was in his implication that a current crisis was judgment for an incident 200 years ago—and that we as humans are in a place to make these cause and effect connections.

In doing this, he falls into the same error as Jesus' undiscerning disciples who asked about the man born blind in John 9:2-3, "Who sinned, this man or his parents?" and the followers who inquired about the Galileans Pilate murdered (Luke 13:1-5).

In both incidents, Jesus turned their attention from idle speculation to worship ("Neither," he said of the blind man. "This happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life.") and repentance ("But unless you repent, you too will all perish.")

Robertson's comments were a distraction from the true spiritual reality of earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, famines and floods: The earth is groaning under the weight of a universal curse and waits expectantly for its redemption. Both sinners and saints equally suffer under this judgment—some in despair and others in expectation of creation's transformation into a new heavens and new earth (Romans 8:18-25).

5 comments:

Carol G. said...

What about this?
“In late April,” wrote the journal Christianity Today in October 2003, “President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a former Catholic priest, declared voodoo an officially recognized religion. It’s a move that some Christians in the chronically poor nation of 7.5 million say is an ominous sign.”

“The government said they are going to turn the country entirely to voodoo,” it quoted Jean Berthony Paul, founder of the Mission Evangelique du Nord D’Haiti.
http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=14079

Mary said...

Thanks for this perspective, Matt!

bman said...

It's funny. I started writing a scathing post about Pat Robertson and his insensitivity and lack of association with the God that I believe in... when... I just couldn't get into it. Every time I started to write a sentence like, "The God I serve doesn't destr--wait." It ended in misconceptions of my own.

The Bible lists times that God punished whole nations for their disbelief, even THE WORLD. Pat Robertson is still crazy, but there's no way to actually tell if a natural disaster is truly natural.

katdish said...

Oooo! Good point!

Tweets that mention Was Pat Robertson Right? | matthewdgreen.com -- Topsy.com said...

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Green, Brian Russell. Brian Russell said: This is a very interesting article: Was Pat Robertson Right? http://bit.ly/61q2yJ (via @matthewdgreen) [...]